nanog mailing list archives

Re: Software-based Border Router


From: Fletcher Kittredge <fkittred () staff gwi net>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:21:57 -0400

Another big problem for Linux/Unix-based routers of this size/cost is
upgrade-ability.   If you need to add cards, you are going to have to bring
the router down for extended periods.   Likewise, a software upgrade can be
a bigger deal than on a purpose designed router.   If a router is mission
critical, Linux/Unixed-based has issues over extended periods.

regards,
Fletcher

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:35 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Nathanael C. Cariaga
<nccariaga () stluke com ph> wrote:
Thank you for the prompt response.  Just to clarify my previous
post, I was actually referring to Linux/Unix-based routers.
We've been considering this solution because presently we
don't have any budget for equipment acquisition this year.

What's your time worth?

Quagga on Linux is a fine software, but messing with the
idiosyncrasies is far more time consuming than buying a Cisco 2811,
adding enough RAM to handle BGP, configuring it once and forgetting
about it.

Also bear in mind that while your ISP's engineers can help you
configure your Cisco router, Quagga is a mystery to them. You can
still get help... but not from someone who also knows how the ISP's
network is configured.

This is not a problem if you have lots of experience with BGP routing. Do
you?

Regards,
Bill Herrin



--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004




-- 
Fletcher Kittredge
GWI
8 Pomerleau Street
Biddeford, ME 04005-9457
207-602-1134


Current thread: