nanog mailing list archives
Re: Randy in Nevis
From: John Peach <john-nanog () johnpeach com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:05:11 -0400
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:39:33 +0000 Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us> wrote:
465 is not an odd-ball port, it's the standard well-known port for STMPS.It is? That's not what's recorded at:http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbersurd 465/tcp URL Rendesvous Directory for SSM igmpv3lite 465/udp IGMP over UDP for SSMMicrosoft frequently has different ideas about things. ~SethFWIW - 465 is widely deployed as SMTPS, in more than just MS products. I'm actually quite surprised it's not in the well known ports list.
It is on all Linux distros: ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL -- John
Current thread:
- Re: Randy in Nevis, (continued)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Lyndon Nerenberg (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Lyndon Nerenberg (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 27)
- RE: Randy in Nevis Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Owen DeLong (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Leo Vegoda (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Seth Mattinen (Sep 28)
- RE: Randy in Nevis Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis John Peach (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Bjørn Mork (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis John Peach (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Chris Boyd (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Bjørn Mork (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis John Peach (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Owen DeLong (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis John Peach (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Bjørn Mork (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Tony Finch (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 29)
