nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T Dry Pairs?
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:46:29 -0700
On 9/30/2010 15:34, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Sep 30, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:On 9/30/2010 15:12, Bret Clark wrote:If the buildings are a 100ft apart, can't you just go with a wireless connection? Speeds would probably be better and no monthly fee!Wireless is not the end all solution for everything.Understood, but for $160 you can get equipment that acts as a L2 bridge with RJ45 and PoE at 50Mb/s duplex. (UBNT Nanobridge 5, they're $79 per and do 5Ghz 802.11n MCS-15 @ 40Mhz channels). Just trying to help :)
The biggest laugh I always got when I worked at the local university as a student were trouble tickets to the Faraday cage rooms because the campus wireless internet didn't work inside them. "But it's wireless!" "Yes, that's the problem. Please just use the damn cable." ~Seth
Current thread:
- AT&T Dry Pairs? Brandon Galbraith (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Ryan Shea (Sep 30)
- RE: AT&T Dry Pairs? George Bonser (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Ricky Beam (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Robert Johnson (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Bret Clark (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Seth Mattinen (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Jared Mauch (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Seth Mattinen (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Bret Clark (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Ryan Shea (Sep 30)
