Re: IPv6 status

[Franck Martin <franck () genius com>]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charles N Wyble" <charles () knownelement com>
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:57:23 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 status
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/09/2011 06:35 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> > Looking at the recent exchange on the list re IPv6, it seems we are
> > in the "whose fault is it?"
> >
> >     • Denial (this isn't happening to me!)
> >     • Anger (why is this happening to me ?)
> >     • Bargaining (I promise I'll be a better person if ...)
> >     • Depression (I don't care anymore)
> >     • Acceptance ( I'm ready for whatever comes)
> >
> > So I guess we progressed from last year which was denial!
> >
> > Can we move on with the program and get to the bargaining phase?
>
> Isn't that CGNAT? :)

I have a friend, each time someone tells him "our gear is carrier grade", he asks them "Is it that bad?"