nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Paul Graydon <paul () paulgraydon co uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:27:40 -1000
On 02/01/2011 04:11 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Lee Howard wrote:"People won't be able to access our site" sure helps but being unable to put a date on it still reduces incentive (especially when Management get involved, and especially if there is a financial outlay involving firewalls etc.).Geoff generously provided a probabilistic sense for RIR runout: http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/rir.jpg Pick your RIR and plot its runout date. If it's ARIN, then the first ISP is out of IPv4 addresses at most three months later (since ARIN now allocates for three months' need). Of course, if demand increases, these dates might change. Will users be unable to reach your content on $RIR_runout_date + 3? They might have to get there through large-scale NAT. That might bother management if you rely on IP geo-location, or need to initiate connections downstream, or rate limit per IP address, or have anti-DOS techniques measuring hits per source IP address, or have employees VPN in, or need to report intrusions, or any of the many problems widely documented. Oh, and when I said to pick your RIR, I meant the RIR of users who access your content. LeeI think there is a key problem with Geoff's graph. I think it fails to take into account the transitive probability of requests among the largest 3 regions. I agree that APNIC will probably run just about exactly as he predicts. I think, however, that the runout at APNIC will create a higher demand in ARIN and RIPE. Once that happens, their runout dates will get moved up much closer to the runout date of APNIC. As soon as the second of the three runs out, the remaining one will get another burst of acceleration. It does not appear to me that this probability is accounted for in the plots. Owen (Including Geoff because it's not fair to criticize his work behind his back)
Are there any expectations of a Gold Rush for the remaining addresses? I would expect to see at least see some kind of escalation.
Paul
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Justin M. Streiner (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Martin Millnert (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
- RE: quietly.... Lee Howard (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Kevin Stange (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... George Herbert (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Skeeve Stevens (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Christopher Morrow (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
