nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Failover Question
From: Bret Clark <bclark () spectraaccess com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:11:28 -0500
On 02/22/2011 12:23 PM, Hammer wrote:
Well as someone else stated, if an upstream provider can't provide BGP reliably then it's time to give them the boot. Once in a year, okay, but beyond that, then it's time to read riot act with that provider.As Max stated, you can set triggers based on thresholds that are monitered via multiple methods in Cisco IOS. That way you could force the route down dynamically. There's always a risk when letting the machines do the thinking but this would help in situations like this. Can't speak for other vendors but I'm sure the features are similar.
Bret
Current thread:
- BGP Failover Question Chris Wallace (Feb 21)
- RE: BGP Failover Question Brian Johnson (Feb 21)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Max Pierson (Feb 21)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Seth Mattinen (Feb 21)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Max Pierson (Feb 21)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Seth Mattinen (Feb 21)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Max Pierson (Feb 21)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Charles Gucker (Feb 21)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Chris Wallace (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Hammer (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Bret Clark (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Hammer (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Owen DeLong (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Hammer (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Hammer (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Owen DeLong (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Hammer (Feb 22)
- Re: BGP Failover Question Chris Wallace (Feb 22)
