nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:27:48 -0500
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:01:52 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
----- Original Message -----From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:41:12 EST, Matthew Huff said:SMTP is definitely not a p2p protocol in most corporate environments.Ahem. Please quit confusing "the protocol" with "that small segment of the protocol we choose to allow/support on our network".Ahem. Please quit confusing "The Internet" with "my small edge network, which I interconnect with The Internet".
Corporations use a different version of RFC5321 that's 30% shorter and removes features they happen to not use? Or are they using the same RFC5321, but simply not using all the features? The distinction is in fact important.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: quietly...., (continued)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... kmedcalf () dessus com (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Dave CROCKER (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Dave CROCKER (Feb 19)
