nanog mailing list archives

Re: Weekend Gedankenexperiment - The Kill Switch


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:13:34 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:07 PM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:


The federal government clearly has the authority to manage
communications across the border of the country and between states but
it would be questionable if the federal government has the authority to
manage any communications completely within a state.  Do they have the
authority to tell me to turn down a connection that terminates within
the same state that I am in?

Sure, they would have the authority to tell me to turn down any
international tunnels I might have running or a point-to-point that
crosses state lines but I doubt they have the authority to tell me to
turn down a cross-connect terminating in the same building.  That would
be the jurisdiction of state authority, not federal.


I am making no argument to the contrary.

But I should caution you that there are forces at work currently which are
making motions to federalize this authority.

I think we all should be deeply concerned -- some of this
pandering/politicizing/scar-mongering can have ill effects.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFNS5kHq1pz9mNUZTMRAv3oAKCsa61VtcyKOiVWqGZ2mJX4eFScuACffSWB
thx5VA2MbLZyGn/GzH3Qz2M=
=oKF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: