nanog mailing list archives

Re: quietly....


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:32:59 +1100


In message <201102041140.42719.lowen () pari edu>, Lamar Owen writes:
On Friday, February 04, 2011 09:05:09 am Derek J. Balling wrote:
I think they'll eventually notice a difference. How will an IPv4-only inter
nal host know what to do with an IPv6 AAAA record it gets from a DNS lookup?

If the CPE is doing DNS proxy (most do) then it can map the AAAA record to an
A record it passes to the internal client, with an internal address for the 
record chosen from RFC1918 space, and perform IPv4-IPv6 1:1 NAT from the assi
gned RFC1918 address to the external IPv6 address from the AAAA record (since
you have at least a /64 at your CPE, you can even use the RFC1918 address in
the lower 32 bits.... :-P).  

This may already be a standard, or a draft, or implemented somewhere; I don't
know.  But that is how I would do it, just thinking off the top of my head.


DS-lite delivers a IPv4 softwire over a IPv6 upstream.  It also
introduces less problems than NAT64 as it works with DNSSEC and
with IPv4 literal.  Along with DS-lite there is a UPNP replacement
designed to work with distributed NATs (DS-Lite (AFTR+B4) and NAT444
(LSN + CPE NAT)) so that holes can be punched threw multiple devices
if needed.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: