nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:45:59 +0000
On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
A stateful firewall on every router interface has been suggested already on this thread. It is unrealistic.
It isn't just unrealistic, it's highly undesirable, since it represents an huge DoS state vector. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid, with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves. -- Alan Kay
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mark Smith (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Richard Barnes (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Seth Mattinen (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- RE: NIST IPv6 document George Bonser (Jan 05)
