nanog mailing list archives
Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:51:34 GMT
We have offered on numerous occasions to peer with both of the providers that are currently segmented from our ASN (6939), going even so far as baking a cake for Cogent (AS174).
Are some parties refusing to use transit, trying to bake in a de-facto "tier-1" ness? brandon
Current thread:
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network, (continued)
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network Jima (Jan 08)
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network Matthew Kaufman (Jan 08)
- RE: Problems with removing NAT from a network Frank Bulk (Jan 08)
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network Matthew Kaufman (Jan 08)
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network Cameron Byrne (Jan 09)
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network Matthew Kaufman (Jan 10)
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network Mark Andrews (Jan 05)
- Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network Benson Schliesser (Jan 05)