nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: lorddoskias <lorddoskias () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:39:56 +0000
On 1/10/2011 3:31 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:
Hello gents:
I wanted to put this out there for all of you. Our network consists of a mixture of Cisco and Extreme equipment.
Would you say that it's fair to say that if you are serious at all about being a service provider that your core
equipment is Cisco based?
Am I limiting myself by thinking that Cisco is the "de facto" vendor of choice? I'm not looking for so much "fanboy"
responses, but more of a real world
experience of what you guys use that actually work and does the job.....
No technical questions here, just general feedback. I try to follow the Tolly Group who compares products, and they
continually show that Cisco equipment
is a poor performer in almost any equipment compared to others, I find that so hard to believe.....
Thanks!
Brandon
Just as a pointer - one of the largest and most utilized IX (AMS-IX) has
their platform built on Brocade devices.
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Owen DeLong (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? lorddoskias (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Owen DeLong (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Donnelly (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? lorddoskias (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? b nickell (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jethro R Binks (Jan 11)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Ron Broersma (Jan 11)
