Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Jack Bates wrote:

> On 1/12/2011 11:01 AM, George Bonser wrote:
> > NAT66 is just
> > straight static NAT that maps one prefix to a different prefix.
>
> I'd eat a hat if a vendor didn't implement a PAT equivalent. It's demanded too much. There is money for it, so it 
> will be there.
>
>
> Jack

Fortunately, so far, it isn't. Hopefully we can cure the demand through education instead of acquiescence and 
profiteering.

Owen