nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:04:17 -0700
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
Thankfully, the current test has been a success. We are going to stay inHooray for testing in production.we are not dealing with stupid or inexperienced people here. i assume they tested. but, like our beloved vendors, they also have a hard time reproducing the real network in the lab, so we end up debugging it for them. otoh, i am willing to wager that in a few weeks, we will not see bugs in the list. sure can't say the same for the vendors.
Please -- give it a rest. And let's take this thread to it's ultimate conclusion, please. - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward, (continued)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Mattias Ahnberg (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Mattias Ahnberg (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Richard Kulawiec (Jul 13)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ben McGinnes (Jul 14)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Alex Ryu (Jul 14)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ben McGinnes (Jul 14)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Richard Kulawiec (Jul 13)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Jay Ashworth (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Randy Bush (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Paul Ferguson (Jul 12)
- RE: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ralph E. Whitmore, III (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward -Hammer- (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Jimmy Hess (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward -Hammer- (Jul 13)
