nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 BGP communities
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:52:23 -0700
In a message written on Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:08:13AM -0700, Serge Vautour wrote:
I'm looking at re-writing our IPv4 BGP policies for IPv6. Does anyone see a problem with re-using the same BGP community values? If we use AS:110 for LP 110 under IPv4, can I just use AS:110 for LP 110 under IPv6? Technically it works - at least I haven't seen a problem in my initial tests. It sure would make everything easier than assigning new values. Is there a BCP for this?
Some of us run BGP implementations that allow us to process IPv4
and IPv6 routes in the exact same route policy.
On behalf of that group I urge you to use the same communities where
the meaning is in fact the same, because if you don't you'll double
the work for that group when they have to write separate route
policy.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IPv6 BGP communities Serge Vautour (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv6 BGP communities Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv6 BGP communities Leo Bicknell (Jun 17)
