nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:47:25 +1000


In message <201106180718.p5I7IrBe020792 () mail r-bonomi com>, Robert Bonomi write
s:

Subject: Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>

MacDonald's would likely get title to .macdonalds under the new rules, 
right?

Well... Which MacDonald's?

 1. The fast food chain
 2. O.C. MacDonald's Plumbing Supply
 3. MacDonald and Sons Paving Systems
 4. MacDonald and Madison Supply Company
 5. etc.

Easy to resolve (excuse the pun) _that_ one.

The _senior_ claimant to that domain would be Clan MacDonald, of Scotland.

Who gets 'apple'?  Apple (the computer company), Apple (the record company)?
  How about the 'fruit of the month' club?

Now, if you want a _hard_ problem, who gets to register 'YellowPages' ?
<*EVIL* grin>
 
YellowPages would work.  It's used under licence.

au.YellowPages
uk.YellowPages
 
As for single label hostnames, RFC 897 got rid of single label
hostnames and they should not come back.  They are a security issue,
see RFC 1535.

This has been pointed out in the past.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: