nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & HE
From: Jay Hanke <jay.hanke () mankatonetworks com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:47:09 -0500
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Paul Stewart <paul () paulstewart org> wrote:
Or peer with HE and buy transit from Cogent (or someone on Cogent's friendly list) - this is where I think their strategy is going to go after a while with a lot of folks (if they have the option - that's the key). HE will peer with anyone I believe - Cogent has much more stringent "tier1" rules on peering.
How divided is the table? I see about 98 routes transiting Cogent ASN via a HE connection. Customer has only has HE as v6 upstream. An previous post listed about a 1300 prefix difference. That's pretty significant unless it's due to aggregation or something. I'd also be interested to see the size of the other major carriers v6 tables so I can patch a whole until the other upstream is ready. Jay
Current thread:
- Cogent & HE Dennis Burgess (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Seth Mattinen (Jun 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cogent & HE Brielle Bruns (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE manny (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Nathan Eisenberg (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jared Mauch (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jay Hanke (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Martin Millnert (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Kevin Loch (Jun 08)
