nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent IPv6


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:02:26 -0400

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net> wrote:
Some networks prefer a uniform numbering scheme. /112 allows for reasonable
addressing needs on a circuit. In addition, while Ethernet is often used in
a point-to-point access circuit, such layouts may change and renumbering
would be annoying.

Finally, having chunks 4-7 define the circuit and chunk 8 provide the
circuit addressing makes it more human readable and is prone to less
mistakes by those who suck at math.

Hi Jack,

I follow the reasoning, but unless you attach undue importance to the
colons you get basically the same result with a /124.

I guess choosing /112 for a point to point link is one of the weird
side-effects of placing :'s in the address at fixed locations instead
of arbitrary locations that serve the writer's mnemonic convenience.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside comĀ  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: