nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent IPv6
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:59:13 +0200
On 9 jun 2011, at 14:19, sthaug () nethelp no wrote:
It is perfectly possible to use RA *only* for the default router, and not announce any prefix at all. This implies a link-local next hop.
Router advertisements always use the router's link local address, you can't get a router's global address from this. IPv6 routing protocols also pretty much only use link locals, so link local next hop and default routes are completely routine.
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jack Bates (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Jun 09)
- RE: Cogent IPv6 George Bonser (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chuck Anderson (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Rob Evans (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Grzegorz Janoszka (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 sthaug (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chuck Anderson (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 sthaug (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 sthaug (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Message not available
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Tim Chown (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Tim Franklin (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 10)
