nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent IPv6
From: "Dennis Burgess" <dmburgess () linktechs net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:22:18 -0500
We have a IPv6 peer with Cogent, in St. Louis, no extra fees were charged. Just a FYI. ----------------------------------------------------------- Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS" -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Wheeler [mailto:jsw () inconcepts biz] Sent: June 09, 2011 12:14 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Cogent IPv6 On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:50 AM, ML <ml () kenweb org> wrote:
I guess someone with a >1 Gb commit in a not so small city deserves to be charged extra for a few Mbps of IPv6... For a not so full table at that.
We canceled some 10GbE Cogent circuits because of Cogent's refusal to provision IPv6 without adding extra fees, and I expressed my reasoning well in advance of canceling the first one. I have been told that they have now eliminated the special fee for North American customers, but just two weeks ago I heard about this IPv6 surcharge stupidity still being applied to Cogent's customers in Europe. If you want to change your vendor, sometimes you have to change your vendor. -- Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz> Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Xiaoliang Zhao (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chris Russell (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ask Bjørn Hansen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 ML (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Tom Hill (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 ML (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeff Wheeler (Jun 09)
- RE: Cogent IPv6 Dennis Burgess (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeroen Wunnink (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Tom Hill (Jun 09)
