nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:07:30 -0700
In a message written on Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:54:15AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
If you have a broad view of damaged, this may be plausable. Remember
that "damaged" does not mean traffic impacting in all cases, for
instance...
- one side of a redundant cable impacted, so no down time to actual
traffic on 1+1 circuits.
- Landing station in Japan has damage, or even simply no power and
is running on generator. So perhaps all services are up, but
it's now got to be kept fueled, and/or physical damage may require
repairs in the near future.
Due to great circle routing distances a lot of pacific cables go near
Japan or have Japanese landing sites on their northern paths, even if
going further south.
I would like to see some more specific data about the types of damage to
the cables, and expected time to repair.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Marshall Eubanks (Mar 14)
- RE: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Masato YAMANISHI (Mar 14)
- Re: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 14)
- 213.123.192.0/20 | 193.179.160.0/22 | 174.132.0.0/15 | 65.75.128.0/18 Gavin Pearce (Mar 15)
- RE: 213.123.192.0/20 | 193.179.160.0/22 | 174.132.0.0/15 | 65.75.128.0/18 Gavin Pearce (Mar 16)
- Announcement: FlowViewer v3.4 released Joe Loiacono (Mar 18)
- Re: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Leo Bicknell (Mar 14)
- RE: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Masato YAMANISHI (Mar 14)
