nanog mailing list archives
Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2
From: James Brown <jamesbbrown04 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:19:52 -0500
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com> wrote:
Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and selectiveQinQ.Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes the cost per port too high.Cisco ME6524 has a model with 32 SFP ports (24 with 3:1 oversubscription, 8 non-oversubscribed) and "IP Base" IOS which has very limited L3 features (RIP and EIGRP stub only), focused on Layer 2 deployments. Rubens The ME3600X might be more a more appropriate Cisco solution than the
ME6524. The ME3600X is one of the current metro MDU access CPE device of choice. 2x10GE and 24xGE SFP or Copper versions with Metro Feature set. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10956/index.html *In the spirit of full disclosure I am biased towards this vendor
Current thread:
- Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Adam Armstrong (Mar 02)
- Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Nick Colton (Mar 02)
- RE: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Mark Gauvin (Mar 02)
- RES: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Eduardo Schoedler (Mar 02)
- Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Rubens Kuhl (Mar 02)
- Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Adam Armstrong (Mar 02)
- Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 James Brown (Mar 02)
- Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Adam Armstrong (Mar 02)
- Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 sthaug (Mar 02)
- RE: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 George Bonser (Mar 02)
- Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Nick Colton (Mar 02)
