nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
From: Nicholas Meredith <nicholas () udhaonline net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:01:10 +1000
Why do you even need a AAAA record to do that? Just do a traceroute to the v6 address. The temporary AAAA record seems to do nothing useful in your proposed procedure. Easiest hack to test site usability: Modify your hosts file. Don't even publish the record in DNS until you're ready. Then there's no SEO implications. :)
You could go direct to the v6 addy, but using your hosts file for a dns record isn't going to work for the remote route servers I suggest testing from. Using a temp AAAA doesn't hurt, or lose you anything, and is technically a more accurate test, ultimatly I leave it to your discretion. \n
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Fred Baker (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Ryan Rawdon (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 29)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Alexander Harrowell (Mar 30)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 30)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Franck Martin (Mar 30)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 31)
