 
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Amazon diagnosis
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 14:10:40 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike" <mike-nanog () tiedyenetworks com>
On 04/29/2011 12:35 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:*http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/*<http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/>So, in a nut shell, Amazon had a single point of failure which touched off this entire incident. I am still waiting for proof that single points of failure can realistically be completely eliminated from any moderately complicated network environment / application. So far, I think murphy is still winning on this one.
Well, in fairness to Amazon, let's ask this: did the failure occur *behind a component interface they advertise as Reliable*? Either way, was it possible for a single customer to avoid that possible failure, and at what cost in expansion of scope and money? Cheers, -- jra
Current thread:
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Mike (May 01)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Jay Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Andrew Kirch (May 01)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Jeff Wheeler (May 01)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Paul Graydon (May 01)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Jeroen van Aart (May 02)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Jeroen van Aart (May 02)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis George Herbert (May 02)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Jason Baugher (May 03)
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Phil Pierotti (May 03)
 
 
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Jeff Wheeler (May 01)
 
- Re: Amazon diagnosis Paul Graydon (May 02)


