nanog mailing list archives

Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes


From: "Yaoqing(Joey) Liu" <joey.liuyq () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:48:31 -0500

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:10 AM, John Kristoff <jtk () cymru com> wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2011 11:54:17 +0300
Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca> wrote:

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the original question, but the assertion
that anybody is hijacking that particular prefix seems false.

Furthermore, that exchange prefixes may often appear to be anycast is
not unusual.  Those prefixes are often originated by multiple disparate
networks who are connected to the exchange.
You mean that many different exchange points are using the same set of
prefixes as anycast service in different physical locations?
That sounds interesting to me.

Yaoqing

 In a lightning talk I did
at NANOG 41, I talked about mapping peering relationships at exchanges.
When I noted that these prefixes are often announced by exchange
participants, Louie Lee explained that some of his participants often
announce the space to their transit customers so that monitoring and
troubleshooting tools don't cause confusion (e.g. traceroutes).

John



Current thread: