 
nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 foot-dragging
From: George Bonser <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:41:04 -0700
A lot. I see /48 breakouts from /32 PA blocks for instance, announced by a customer AS of the PA holder AS. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Which is kinda sad. If those customer AS are multihomed or plan to be multihomed, they can get their own allocation out of PI space. If they are not multihomed outside of the provider AS, there is no need for the provider to "leak" that /48 out of their AS to their peers.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Mike Tancsa (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging William Astle (May 11)
 
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging ML (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Sasa Ristic (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Bernhard Schmidt (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joe Loiacono (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen Massar (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Mikael Abrahamsson (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Martin Millnert (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jimmy Hess (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeff Wheeler (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Matthew Petach (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
 
 
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Mike Tancsa (May 11)
 
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joe Loiacono (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 13)


