 
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
From: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen () switch ch>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 12:49:50 +0200
David Conrad writes:
Sorry, poorly worded. What I was wondering is there is an equivalent of KA9Q for IPv6.
But KA9Q is already certified for IPv6! http://ipv6.he.net/certification/scoresheet.php?pass_name=ka9q (found on http://www.ka9q.net/) SCNR. -- Simon.
Current thread:
- RE: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space), (continued)
- RE: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)
 
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Owen DeLong (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Wil Schultz (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) David Conrad (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Wil Schultz (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) David Conrad (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Lyndon Nerenberg (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Adrian Chadd (May 26)
 
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) William Allen Simpson (May 27)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Simon Leinen (May 28)
 


