nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cable standards question


From: Daniel Seagraves <dseagrav () humancapitaldev com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0600


On Nov 14, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Sam (Walter) Gailey wrote:

"The vendor will provide fiber connectivity between (building A) and (building B). Vendor will be responsible for all 
building penetrations and terminations. When  installing the fiber-optic cable the vendor will follow the appropriate 
TIA/EIA 568 standards for fiber-optic cabling."

Any suggestions or examples of language would be very appreciated. Offlist contact is probably best.

Is it appropriate to just say "When installing fiber-optic cable the vendor will ensure the resulting installation does 
not suck."?
That would seem to me to be the most direct solution to the problem. I mean, standards are all well and good, but what 
if the standard sucks?
Then you'd be up a creek.

Maybe there should be a legal definition of the concept of suck, so that suckage could be contractually minimized.



Current thread: