nanog mailing list archives
Re: economic value of low AS numbers
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:52:33 -0500 (EST)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hart" <davehart () gmail com>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 19:08, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:whois -h whois.arin.net 42RFC 943: 42 THINK-AS [BJN1] [BJN1] Bruce Nemnich TMC BJN () MIT-MC ARPA I have no idea which registry was maintaining AS number registrations when AS42 changed hands. I suppose it's possible the current registrant acquired or merged with whatever entity THINK refers to, but I doubt it, so it seems likely at least at one time transfers were reflected in updated registrations.
I'd be shocked, shocked I tell... oh, yes; put the money over here please. Shocked, I tell you, if that wasn't Thinking Machines Corp., which was formed by MIT grads, as I remember it. The real question is whether it was issued after HHGTTG. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers, (continued)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Kevin Loch (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers David Conrad (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Hank Nussbacher (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Richard Irving (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers David Conrad (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Daniel Roesen (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Barry Shein (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert Bonomi (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Kevin Loch (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jim Mercer (Nov 17)
