nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US)
From: Brett Frankenberger <rbf+nanog () panix com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:59:31 -0600
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 05:45:08PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Yeah. But at least that's stuff you have a hope of managing. "Firmware underwent bit rot" is simply not visible -- unless there's, say, signature tracing through the main controller.
I can't speak to traffic light controllers directly, but at least some
vital logical controllers do check signatures of their firmware and
programming and will fail into a safe configuration if the
signatures don't validate.
-- Brett
Current thread:
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US), (continued)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Jay Ashworth (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Jay Hennigan (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Jay Ashworth (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Jay Hennigan (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Bryan Fields (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Mark Radabaugh (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Brett Frankenberger (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Thomas Maufer (Nov 23)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Jay Hennigan (Nov 25)
- Re: OT: Traffic Light Control (was Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US) Joel jaeggli (Nov 25)
