nanog mailing list archives
Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:28:00 -0400
On Friday, September 30, 2011 05:54:38 PM steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
I seem to recollect back the 1999 or 2000 times that I was unable to register a domain name that was 24 characters long. Shortly after that, I heard that the character limit had been increased to like 128 characters, and we were able to register the name. Can anyone offer some input, or is this a memory of a bad dream? ;-]
At least as of 2008, you could go 45 characters, not counting the TLD:
++++++++++++++++++
$ whois pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.com
[Querying whois.verisign-grs.com]
[Redirected to whois.above.com]
[Querying whois.above.com]
[whois.above.com]
The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.Registration Service Provided By: ABOVE.COM, Pty. Ltd.
Contact: +613.95897946
Domain Name: PNEUMONOULTRAMICROSCOPICSILICOVOLCANOCONIOSIS.COM
Registrant:
Above.com Domain Privacy
8 East concourse
Beaumaris
VIC
3193
AU
pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.com () privacy above com
Tel. +61.395897946
Fax.
Creation date: 2008-02-20
Expiration Date: 2012-02-20
...
$ ping www.pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.com
PING www.pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.com (69.43.161.151) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 69.43.161.151: icmp_req=1 ttl=50 time=85.9 ms
64 bytes from 69.43.161.151: icmp_req=3 ttl=50 time=85.7 ms
64 bytes from 69.43.161.151: icmp_req=4 ttl=50 time=85.8 ms
64 bytes from 69.43.161.151: icmp_req=5 ttl=50 time=85.6 ms
^C
--- www.pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 4 received, 20% packet loss, time 4002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.618/85.815/85.984/0.132 ms
+++++++++++++++++++++
FWIW.
Current thread:
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Lamar Owen (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Jimmy Hess (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? bmanning (Oct 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 11)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Jay Ashworth (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Joe Hamelin (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Jay Ashworth (Oct 07)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
