Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report

[Randy Bush <randy () psg com>]

> From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody
> reads this any more.

some read it.  we are the frustrated ones.

no one seems to act on it.

> Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with
> this report?

not clear, sad to say.

i really think that the only way to reduce fragging is filtering.  maybe
a bgp blackhole feed for frags for which there are covering prefixes?

randy