nanog mailing list archives
Re: Did Internap lose all clue?
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:19:13 -0500
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:48:34PM +0200, bas wrote:
Recently I was contacted by an Internap sales person. The third line of the email read: "As you know well, BGP makes all routing decisions simply based on HOP COUNT" I blinked my eyes a couple of times.. Yes it really said hop count. Then I replied to the guy that if he tries to sell a technical product to technical people he should get his info straight.
Errr, I think they mean AS hops, which is actually mostly correct. After you eliminate things that don't actually convey any information (like localpref, which you have to configure yourself), and things that don't provide any meaningful data in a multi-network path selection role (like MEDs), AS-PATH length is pretty much the only useful basis you have for picking a best path from your BGP peers. All other marketing crap asside, they aren't incorrect in pointing out that BGP really sucks as a way to pick a best path. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue?, (continued)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? manny (Oct 20)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? Brant I. Stevens (Oct 20)
- RE: Did Internap lose all clue? Darrell Hyde (Oct 20)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? Bruce Pinsky (Oct 20)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? bas (Oct 20)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? Jack Bates (Oct 20)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 20)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? Jack Bates (Oct 20)
- Re: Did Internap lose all clue? Matt Buford (Oct 21)
