nanog mailing list archives
Re: Facebook insecure by design
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:54:40 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:45:33 -0700 Subject: Re: Facebook insecure by design Cc: nanog () nanog org The way I look at it, unless you want to host everything yourself, you have to choose "someone" to be your Unix like home directory in the cloud.
Correct. Either it's 'local', or it's "somewhere else" -- by definition. :)
Of all the internet entities out there, Google has had the best track record of protecting your data.
As far as we know, that is. Remember the old saying about 'undiscovered bugs'. <wry grin>
You can even download it all and erase yourself if you want out.
Don't count on it. You may 'disappear' from public view, but that does not necessarily mean the data is truely 'gone'. Specific example -- if you request a USENET posting to be removed, all they do is make it 'invisible' to the world. It is _not_ removed from the databases, or from inernal access/use.
Current thread:
- Re: OT: Social Networking, Privacy and Control, (continued)
- Re: OT: Social Networking, Privacy and Control Travis Biehn (Oct 05)
- Config files? Green, Timothy (Oct 05)
- Re: Config files? William Herrin (Oct 05)
- Re: Config files? David Swafford (Oct 08)
- Re: Config files? isabel dias (Oct 08)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design Murtaza (Oct 19)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 23)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design Jeroen Massar (Oct 23)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design Jay Ashworth (Oct 23)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 23)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design Robert Bonomi (Oct 24)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design Lou Katz (Oct 24)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 26)
- Re: Facebook insecure by design steve pirk [egrep] (Oct 23)
