nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation
From: Elijah Savage <esavage () digitalrage org>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
Thank you for the reply. Yes an aggregator, large deployment. Initially this is discovery, though price is always important it is most about understanding operations and implementation at this point. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com> To: "Elijah Savage" <esavage () digitalrage org> Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 1:44:22 PM Subject: Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation "SIP trunking consolidation" is buzzword heavy and context-light. What problem are you trying to solve and at what scale? Do you have a requirement to have the provider be a traditional TDM-based organization or is an aggregator sufficient? How price-sensitive are you? At fairly small scale (10 DIDs including some 877 numbers, feeding to Asterisk) I've had fine luck with http://voip.ms/ But your requirements may vary... -r Elijah Savage <esavage () digitalrage org> writes:
Anyone here that have gone through the process of SIP trunking consolidation care to comment offline on Whom do you utilize? What has been your experience operationally? What was your experience during transition/implementation? Thank you ahead of time.
Current thread:
- SIP Carrier Consolidation Elijah Savage (Apr 05)
- Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 05)
- Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation Elijah Savage (Apr 05)
- Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation Daryl G. Jurbala (Apr 05)
- Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation Elijah Savage (Apr 06)
- Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation Elijah Savage (Apr 05)
- Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 05)
