nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS?!
From: Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:37:13 -0600
On 4/6/12 9:02 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
No, they don't. Many DNSBLs use self-service tools. Someone has to write the tool, but the rest is automated. Total cost is power& space, which is frequently donated (I have personally donated some myself to DNSBLs I thought were well run).
Proxy removals and automated additions are self service removals. I don't trust automated removal for stuff that we add by hand. Too many variables, too much in the way of games...
If I were to let the people in spam-sources request removal and handle removal entirely on their own without one of us reviewing it by hand, there'd be no entries left in my database.
Besides, anyone who knowingly causes harm to a third party and claims "it is a cost of doing business" or "mostly people like it" or "our $FOO is targeted and almost always correct, you must be an outlier and that's why it costs you" sound -exactly- like spammers to me.
I was more pointing out to people that you expect someone else, who you've got no contractual obligation with, or relationship with, to make time and effort to handle a request you made.
All I hear these days from people is that I have no right to tell them who they can have as customers, or how to run their business.
Well, the reverse applies as well. I take great offense to people telling me how to run my own service, that I provide free at no charge with no obligations.
When a provider actually works with me to resolve an issue, I bend over backwards to help them. Unfortunately, those kinds of providers are few and far in between.
Spammer who are up-front about it I can deal with. Don't agree with or even like them, but at least we understand each other. Hypocrisy is a different story.
Unfortunately, the apathy of providers, backbones, and network operators in general have created an environment that the almighty buck rules everything.
Yeah, I've had offers for financial support of the AHBL. Turned them down every time, even though it would give me a chance to hire actual people to run it. But, then, I'd have someone hanging over my shoulder, pulling strings and interfering with my project. My independence goes out the window, and I can't truly say I have no financial interest in the listings.
So, forgive me if my independence as a non-commercial DNSbl makes me somewhat jaded towards people who expect me to prioritize their demands over what pays the bills.
-- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- SORBS?! Chris Conn (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Matt Kelly (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Paul Graydon (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! George Herbert (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! David Miller (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Mark Foster (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jimmy Hess (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! chris (Apr 06)
