nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Changer items
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:54:46 -0600
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
Approx 2 months later after taking legal advice, the NCC formed the view that the police and the prosecutor had no legal basis for making the request and they consequently unlocked the objects.
With the end result that someone gets some really nicely tainted/blocked address space. Hopefully whoever it is wears a white hat and doesn't respond to unsuspecting people's DNS queries with 'interesting' values. "Legal basis": IANAL so no comment. However, for network sanitation purposes, I'll admit some surprise that the DNSchanger blocks have been reused so quickly. Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Changer items Stephen Wilcox (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Nick Hilliard (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Nick Hilliard (Aug 16)
- Re: DNS Changer items David Conrad (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Barry Greene (Aug 16)
- Re: DNS Changer items joel jaeggli (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Leo Bicknell (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items joel jaeggli (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Whitney (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items valdis . kletnieks (Aug 15)
