nanog mailing list archives
Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:32:31 -0700
On 8/23/12 2:11 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Owen DeLong wrote:AT&T should just be glad there was a /12 for them to get. That isn't going to be true for much longer.If you are counting on an IPv4 free pool to run your business next year, you are making a bad bet.The 16777214 IP addresses (give or take) in their 12/8 assignment aren't enough? Oh wait, it's probably used internally and renumbering to 10/8 would be too big a hurdle to take. ;-)
show route 12.0.0.0/8 ...
Current thread:
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated, (continued)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated George Herbert (Aug 22)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Owen DeLong (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Blake Hudson (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jared Mauch (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Seth Mattinen (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 23)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Owen DeLong (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jeroen van Aart (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jeroen van Aart (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jon Lewis (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 23)
