nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 End User Fee
From: "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 18:32:55 -0500
By end user I mean hosting clients (cloud, collocation, shared, dedicated, VPS, etc.) of any sort. For example you have clients that would need....say /24 for their dedicated server. If you charge a $1.00/IP which is typical then you would lose that revenue if they converted to IPv6. If you didn't charge for IPv4 then you have nothing to to lose. Otis ________________________________ From: Cutler James R [mailto:james.cutler () consultant com] Sent: Fri 8/3/2012 3:48 PM To: Otis L. Surratt, Jr. Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: IPv6 End User Fee On Aug 3, 2012, at 3:22 PM, "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com> wrote:
Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p <snip/> Otis
I can't imagine that this would be anything but counterproductive. End users are not interested in IPv6 - most would not recognize IPv6 if it fell out of their screen. End users want working connectivity, not jargon. James R. Cutler james.cutler () consultant com
Current thread:
- IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee TJ (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Cutler James R (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee William Pitcock (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Cutler James R (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Derek Ivey (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee George Herbert (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)
