nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:00:47 +0900
IPv4 /32 :: IPv6 /128
i.e. a single host or gkw behind a nat. kinda what i get from comcast and twt now.
IPv4 /29 :: IPv6 /64
i.e. i get a lan segment. makes sense
The minimum assignment requiring a swip is also ensconced in RIR policy.
i am sure that, if you dig deeply enough, a recipe for chocolate chip cookies is ensconced in RIR policy. the bookkeepers drank koolaid and think they have become regulators. does samantha know her mom is a wannabe lawyer? :) randy
Current thread:
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?, (continued)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Owen DeLong (Dec 10)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Mark Andrews (Dec 10)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Constantine A. Murenin (Dec 10)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Owen DeLong (Dec 11)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Owen DeLong (Dec 10)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Doug Barton (Dec 10)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Owen DeLong (Dec 11)
- RE: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Ian Smith (Dec 10)
- Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois? Owen DeLong (Dec 10)
