RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.

[Brandon Lehmann <brandon () bitradius com>]

In any event, I'm pretty sure that I'd rather get hit with "tampering with
evidence" versus them retrieving data that may incriminate me. I believe
this may be a the "lesser of two evils" game.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Creyts [mailto:kyle.creyts () gmail com]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 2:52 PM
> To: Jeroen van Aart
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please
> help if you can.
>
> In most jurisdictions, wouldn't using a de-gaussing ring in the door
> frame to wipe any equipment being removed constitute "tampering with
> evidence" or interfering with an investigation if the authority in
> question is in possession of a warrant/subpoena?
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
> wrote:
>
> > On 11/30/2012 02:02 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> >
> > > OK, there must be a lot more paranoid people out there than I
> thought
> > >
> >
> >  for awhile?  I am sure he will let you out to go to the bank, get
> > your
> > > stuff, and leave town.  I think you have seen way to many movies.
> >
> >  So if the cops show up at his door tomorrow and say "Here's all your
> > > stuff back, there was no evidence of a crime.", you are OK with this
> > > guys keeping the "defense fund"?
> >
> > I for one vote for installing a de-gauging ring in your door frame.
> > any removal of equipment you don't approve of will be wiped. That and
> > encryption possibly combined with hiding the "real" OS (truecrypt can
> > do that).
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Jeroen
> >
> > --
> > Earthquake Magnitude: 5.1
> > Date: Monday, December 17, 2012 17:46:48 UTC
> > Location: central East Pacific Rise
> > Latitude: -3.9682; Longitude: -104.0375
> > Depth: 15.70 km
>
>
> --
> Kyle Creyts
>
> Information Assurance Professional
> BSidesDetroit Organizer

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: