nanog mailing list archives
Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:42:33 -0600
On 12/27/12, Blake Pfankuch <blake () pfankuch me> wrote: It does make no sense, and I would say it is an unusual restriction, but a CA can put any certificate usage restriction they want in their policy, and technically, they have likely included a right to audit and issue out a revokation/CRL for any certificates not following their usage policy: a common example would be a SSL cert used to facilitate phishing. Make your X509 vendor take the language out of the agreement against the use on multiple servers, or buy from one of the many dozens of other certificate providers who issues wildcards and has no such special restriction on certificate usage in the certificate signing/usage policies. :)
Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something a vendor is telling me and hoping some people here have expertise in this area... I am working with a SSL certificate provider. I am trying to purchase a quantity of wildcard SSL certificates to cover about 60 FQDN's across 4
[snip] -- -JH
Current thread:
- SSL Certificates and ... Providers Blake Pfankuch (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Peter Kristolaitis (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers John Adams (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Andrew Latham (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Larry LaBas (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers William Herrin (Dec 27)
- RE: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Blake Pfankuch (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Grant Ridder (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Ken A (Dec 27)
- Re: SSL Certificates and ... Providers Jimmy Hess (Dec 27)
