nanog mailing list archives
Re: Optimal IPv6 router
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:34:26 +0100
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 09:07:57PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
OK, I'll bite. What would qualify as a "native IPv6" router?
Perhaps those which were designed with IPv4+IPv6 in mind from day 1, both in hardware and software - like Juniper/JUNOS. In contrast to other the gear where IPv6 was always an aftermath, which shows in both hardware (limits of performance, functionality and scaling) as well as software (every feature gets implemented twice, even if the feature itself is completely AFI-agnostic - see e.g. IOS/IOS-XE [can't comment on XR]). Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- Optimal IPv6 router Glen Kent (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Leo Bicknell (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Rafael Rodriguez (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Glen Kent (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 06)
- RE: Optimal IPv6 router Leigh Porter (Feb 06)
