RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

[Blake Pfankuch <blake () pfankuch me>]

I would be happy if it was Juniper or Cisco ish.  Right now it's just total crap :)

From: brandon.j.kim () live com [mailto:brandon.j.kim () live com] On Behalf Of Brandon Kim
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:14 AM
To: leigh.porter () ukbroadband com; Blake Pfankuch; jay () miscreant org; jra () baylink com
Cc: nanog group
Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

Never messed around with Juniper....



> From: leigh.porter () ukbroadband com<mailto:leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
> To: brandon.kim () brandontek com<mailto:brandon.kim () brandontek com>; blake () pfankuch me<mailto:blake () 
> pfankuch me>; jay () miscreant org<mailto:jay () miscreant org>; jra () baylink com<mailto:jra () baylink com>
> CC: nanog () nanog org<mailto:nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim () brandontek com]<mailto:[mailto:brandon.kim () brandontek com]>
> > Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51
> > To: blake () pfankuch me<mailto:blake () pfankuch me>; jay () miscreant org<mailto:jay () miscreant org>; jra () 
> > baylink com<mailto:jra () baylink com>
> > Cc: nanog group
> > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> >
> >
> > I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it
> > is CLUNKY.
> >
> > But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco
> > in the near future...
>
> Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style interface rather than something with 
> some more structure like Juniper?
>
>
> --
> Leigh Porter
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________