nanog mailing list archives
RE: time sink 42
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:17:54 +0000
I hate all the newer Brother labelmakers I've seen - pretty much for this very reason. I've never found a good method for quickly and reliably removing the backings for them.
The one thing I absolutely cannot stand about all the low-end brothers is the amount of waste they generate. When printing single labels, they spit out a useless 3/4 inch tab that you have to hit the 'cut' lever for. This tab is the tape that was wasted pushing out the last label. I would estimate this consumes about 20% of the tape on these printers - perhaps less if you chain print or have longer labels. The PT-1830 and PT-1880 are good examples of this insanity.
Current thread:
- Re: time sink 42, (continued)
- Re: time sink 42 Karl Auer (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Jerry Jones (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Aled Morris (Feb 16)
- Which way to fold the label (was: Re: time sink 42) Jay Ashworth (Feb 17)
- Re: Which way to fold the label (was: Re: time sink 42) Karl Auer (Feb 17)
- Re: time sink 42 Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- RE: time sink 42 Nathan Eisenberg (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Leo Bicknell (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 harold barker (Feb 16)
- Which P-Touch should I have? Jay Ashworth (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? William Herrin (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Joe Hamelin (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- RE: Which P-Touch should I have? Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Joe Hamelin (Feb 16)
