nanog mailing list archives

Re: 10G switchrecommendaton


From: Erik Bais <ebais () A2B-Internet com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:05:24 +0100

Hi Fabien,

I strongly have to disagree with you. We run a full bgp implementation on Extreme in our network and are very pleased 
with it and the support that we get from Extreme. One of our x480's we run has about 1.4 milj learned routes and 
another has around 200 bgp peers on the AMS-iX... So what is your point ?

As an ex-Extreme employee making such strong statements, while you don't know the current status at customers, it may 
be best to ask who is using it and how, instead of acting like a grumpy ex-employee. 

Feel free to ask about our setup.

Regards,
Erik Bais

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad

Op Jan 27, 2012 om 15:41 heeft Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1 () mac com> het volgende geschreven:

You can use BGP only for the default route no more :) forget a full view

Le 27 janv. 2012 à 15:34, Fabien Delmotte a écrit :

Only for a full table BGP, in fact it is not able to learn a full BGP table. The X480 could do it, but it is very 
slow and they miss some features

Fabien


Le 27 janv. 2012 à 11:25, Leigh Porter a écrit :


On 27 Jan 2012, at 10:21, "Fabien Delmotte" <fdelmotte1 () mac com> wrote:

I worked for Extreme, and I deployed a lot of X650 (24 10G ports) for DataCenter environment. The box is really 
good.
In fact if you use the box at a layer 2 it is perfect, BUT DON'T use their BGP code, they never understood what is 
BGP :)

Is that don't use for Internet facing full table BGP or do you include iBGP for say VPN as well?

-- 
Leigh


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________





Current thread: