nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Update
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:11:48 -0500
On 7/5/12, Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net> wrote:
It'll get real interesting when Cisco's cloud database is breached and some weakness in the password encryption is discovered.
[snip] Will the users' passwords even matter, if a compromise of the database allows an intruder to make a system-wide change to end users' equipment, such as delivering a compromising configuration change, or a "patched" firmware update that deactivates cloud service and turns them all into botnet nodes under exclusive control of the compromiser ? Hopefully Cisco thought that stuff out, but password encryption weaknesses at least are easily addressed by forcing all users to reset pw, and requiring a proof of physical access to the unit. -- -JH
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco Update, (continued)
- RE: Cisco Update David Hubbard (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Grant Ridder (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeff Johnstone (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Ray Soucy (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Andriy Bilous (Jul 05)
- RE: Cisco Update Keith Medcalf (Jul 05)
- RE: Cisco Update Keith Medcalf (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeff Johnstone (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jimmy Hess (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 07)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeroen van Aart (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update Tyler Haske (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update goemon (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco Update Hank Nussbacher (Jul 06)
