nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv6 day and tunnels

From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin () boeing com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 07:49:27 -0700

The proper solution is to have a field in IPv7 header to
measure PMTU. It can be a 8 bit field, if fragment granularity
is 256B.


We tried that for IPv4 and it didn't work very well [RFC1063].
You are welcome to try again in IPv7 when we have a green field.

Fred
fred.l.templin () boeing com

Current thread:

Re: IPv6 day and tunnels, (continued)
- - - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Mark Andrews (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
    - New routing systems (Was: IPv6 day and tunnels) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
    - Re: New routing systems (Was: IPv6 day and tunnels) Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
    - Re: New routing systems (Was: IPv6 day and tunnels) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
    - RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 05)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 05)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
    - RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Mark Andrews (Jun 05)
    - RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
    - Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 05)

(Thread continues...)