nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 book recommendations?
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:00:02 -0400
On Jun 6, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Anton Smith wrote:
<snip>
Hi all, Potentially silly question but, as Bill points out a LAN always occupies a /64. Does this imply that we would have large L2 segments with a large number of hosts on them? What about the age old discussion about keeping broadcast segments small? Or, will it be that a /64 will only typically have a similar number of hosts in it as say, a /23|4 in the IPv4 world? Cheers, Anton
Now you have deduced the beauty of the scheme. The number of end points does not matter to IPv6 address planning. Said another way - my factory subnet may have a gazillion(1) little machines on one subnet while my data center boxes may have several subnets. Just count the subnets. Let the traffic/technology drive the use per subnet whilst you TRILL(2) a pretty tune. Note (1) Gazillion < 2^64 Note (2) Thanks, Radia James R. Cutler james.cutler () consultant com
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) Douglas Otis (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) William Herrin (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) Douglas Otis (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) William Herrin (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) William Herrin (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) Cameron Byrne (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links) Douglas Otis (Jun 26)
- Re: IPv6 /64 links (was Re: ipv6 book recommendations?) Owen DeLong (Jun 21)
- Re: ipv6 book recommendations? Cutler James R (Jun 06)
- Re: ipv6 book recommendations? valdis . kletnieks (Jun 06)
