nanog mailing list archives

Re: Dear Linkedin,


From: Joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:24:41 -0700

On 6/10/12 00:25 , John Souvestre wrote:
On 6/10/12, Joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:

How good does a password/phrase have to be in order to protect 
against brute-force or dictionary attacks against the password
itself? ? Entropy in language. A typical english sentence has 1.2
bits of entropy per character, you need 107 characters to get a
statistically random md5 hash. Using totally random english
characters you need 28 characters. Using a random distribution of
all 95 printable ascii characters you need 20 characters. ?
Observation, good passwords are hard to come by.

I don't disagree, except regarding dictionary attacks.  If the attack
isn't random then math based on random events doesn't apply.  In the
case of a purely dictionary attack if you choose a non-dictionary
word and you are 100.000% safe.  :)

the search space for 6 8 10 character passwords is entirely too small...

John

John Souvestre - New Orleans LA - (504) 454-0899








Current thread: